There Were No Natural Disasters in Madison..

Which really shocked me.

Since I was going to see Twilight.

And I really wanted to see Twilight.

And I, like, never really get anything I want without surviving a disaster or two first.

But as I was saying, there were no natural disasters in Madison.

And I actually got to see Twilight.

And now you get a review.

Joy.


You know that little page at the end of the novel that says, “Stay tuned for the next installment of Whateverthehellitis you just read. Coming three years from now. If you’re lucky, that is…”?  Well, I loathe that little page for several reasons: 1.) I’m impatient as all hell and 2.) I’m impatient as all hell. So instead of hopping on the Twilight train when all of the original buzz originally generated, I waited to read any of the series until she released the last book.

Which means that, up until then,  every time someone or another wanted to dish all about what Edward and Bella did on page whatever in book whichever, I found myself covering my ears with both hands and reciting the Gettysburg Address loud enough to drown out all of the heartfelt “I love me some brooding emo vampire” statements that seemed to be coming from every female in a thousand mile radius between the ages of twelve and ninety-two.

Of course, this didn’t work for many reasons. For one thing, I don’t know the Gettysburg Address. For another, the act of putting your hands over your ears doesn’t really keep you from hearing squat.

Which probably explains why my toddler once said, “Use your damn blinker, douchebag” to the lady in front of us in the grocery aisle.

And why I was excited to start reading about some brooding emo vampire.

I puffy-hearted Angel, after all.

So I bought all four books at once, thanked the good Lord for my insomnia and imported chocolate, and took one very tiny leap back into the mindset of an emotional teenage girl.

And, lo and behold, I enjoyed them. They were perfect *young* adult escapism fiction with an interesting take on the whole vampire/human girl who doesn’t fit in saga. (Aside: Is anyone else as tired of the whole “we only write about vampires or Tudor history” theme found at your local bookstore as I am? Because seriously, folks, it’s time to move on.) And as long as you weren’t flipping open those jackets in search of a Great Gatsby or a Puck, it was all good in a “totally worth letting the kids eat Cheetos for breakfast this one morning” sort of way.

Then I read about the movie…

And thought, “Oh. I like her. And he’s got good hair. ”

Then I saw the trailer…

And thought, “Hmmm… straight out of the book scenes. Could be decent.”

Then I waited in line for thirty minutes between two herds of giggling teenage girls in order to get tickets…

And thought, “Not expecting Gatsby, remember?”

Then I spent two hours trying to figure out which herd of teenagers would complain the least when I stepped on their toes whilst trying to make my escape…

First off (Yes, we’re finally at the part where I actually talk about the movie. Thank you for your patience.), I can’t imagine how anyone who has NOT read this book and therefore hasn’t already developed some sort of relationship with the characters can find it at all entertaining.  Sticking to Meyer-like stunted dialogue definitely helped to maintain the same sort of teenage-angst-ridden feel on which the books were based, but it did absolutely nothing towards developing the characters themselves. Especially since the only reason that the stunted dialogue was a success in the novels is because it was accompanied by the proper settings, thought processes, and various other useful techniques of advancing a plot properly.

Of course, a lot of those aforementioned techniques don’t really translate well on screen and thus must be conveyed in some other appropriate manner such as… I don’t know… better dialogue?? Whatever. Which Twilight failed to offer. So much so, that it’s almost as if the film gave its audience two slices of bread to make the sandwich* but left the meat, cheese, lettuce, tomato, and mayo in the book.

Which isn’t at all satisfying from this end.

Unless you’ve already eaten the meat, cheese, lettuce, tomato, and mayo by READING. THE. DAMN. BOOKS.

Even then, you’re still faced with less than par acting (Pattinson “overdid” the majority of his part but was pretty charming in a few moments when he was more relaxed), really bad make-up (and I’m not referring to the required coating of pale for the undead but to Bella’s odd eyeshadow placement), and the overzealous use of the clairol on a bunch of people who make terrible blondes.

All in all, I wasn’t thrilled and was far more entertained by the audience of teenagers who loudly reacted thorughout the movie at the most odd moments than by the film itself. (Although, I really liked the random old horror film montages that they threw in on occasion and the soundtrack- which was pretty damned decent.)

Still… here’s to hoping that the next one will be better.

And there’ll totally be a next one.

And I’m looking forward to seeing it.

Because, let’s face it, it’s that or potty-training. And even bad acting and whining vampires beat shit.

I hope.


*Please feel free to replace the sandwich with your favorite metaphor. I tend to just use whatever pops in my head first… And the apple was obviously already taken.

November 22, 2008
Categories: Daily, Only Judith, Prose/Bros
  • http://www.fromtheplanetofjanet.com the planet of janet

    ok, i HAVE to ask…. did you like the fourth book? you weren’t skeeved out by the yuckiness of certain werewolf relationships or infuriated by some of the abject breaking of her own rules by the author????

    • Judith Shakespeare

      As far as writing and overall interestingness go… the fourth book was my favorite. :) I totally hated Bella until she was a vampire. And I definitely felt that she could have figured out a completely different way to handle the whole imprinting mess, but she pretty much explained the hell out of it before it ever happened. I just tried not to dwell too much on it in order to avoid the skeeviness. LOL. And since I wasn’t expecting Gatsby and kept in mind that it was targeted at girls far younger and less cynical than me, I liked it.

      (Of course, I totally don’t buy into the whole “she could have set a better example for teenage girls” bull. It was what it was. And obviously some people forget the point of fluffy fiction. :)

  • http://dragynm.wordpress.com Marie

    My oldest and I have read all 4 books. Yup. We waited to started 1 through 3 until just before #4 was released. Loved ‘em! You hit the nail on the head: Meyer managed to capture the imaginations of both mother and daughter here (I also Puffy Heart Angel *and* Spike). In fact SOC #1 went to a Twilight party last night (we’re talking a group of girls who saw the movie, then had a slumber party afterwards), while I stayed here at home (SOB) because the husband was out of town. I’ve also been looking forward to the movie, but have trepidations about the movie sucking. Based on your review, I might just have to leave the SOCs here with the husband and go to the movies tonight!

    • Judith Shakespeare

      Okay… Dude. I totally have no idea what SOC means. And I think the SOB part means something other than what I was thinking. :)

      • http://dragynm.wordpress.com Marie

        Damn! Sorry! SOC stands for Servants of Chaos, an affectionate term my husband and I use to describe our kids.

        • Judith Shakespeare

          Ahhhh…. yeah. Totally not in the list I was making in my head. Spawn of Christ crossed my mind though. :)

  • http://www.rockanddrool.com melissa

    you know what’s funny is…i’ve been TRYING to get into the book. and…the way you describe the movie is how i’m feeling about the book. the dialogue. i’m just NOT loving it. i think that there is something, basically…very wrong with me because, i’m the ONLY person on the planet who feels this way but…i’m glad how i feel about the book is translating itself into the movie!! phew.

    • Judith Shakespeare

      No! You’re totally NOT the only person who feels that way… The dialogue is pretty much terrible. It took me a moment or two to get involved in the story as well. It gets better as the series goes on… By the fourth book, her writing considerably improves and flows a little more as if it were geared towards an older audience.

  • http://insaneworld.wordpress.com Sandy

    Unfortunately i will probably have to wait until it comes out on video… I won’t go by myself to see it and it is difficult to get a babysitter. :-(

    • Judith Shakespeare

      Why won’t you go by yourself???? I actually prefer going to the movies alone… Of course, my husband still gropes me like we’re sixteen as soon as the lights go down. So that could be why. LOL.

      • http://insaneworld.wordpress.com Sandy

        Because I hate going places by myself. I always have. :-) I don’t enjoy it as much as if someone was with me…and I am scarce on friends up here so it is either DH or no one. :-(

        • Judith Shakespeare

          Wait ’til the new baby gets to toddlerdom…. Then you’ll be begging to go anywhere by yourself. It’ll be the only time that you have a moment of peace.

          • http://insaneworld.wordpress.com Sandy

            Then I will have an easier time getting a sitter!! For some reason no one wants to babysit the baby!!! ;-)

  • http://www.qweeniescourt.blogspot.com Qweenie

    I see…..

    I guess I have some reading to do….

    • Judith Shakespeare

      Duh. (love ya)

  • http://internetfruit.typepad.com Katherine

    I almost never read or watch a series until there are sufficient quantities to keep me from losing my mind while waiting for the next one. I started these about a month ago, and fell into deep and embarrassing love with Edward Cullen. The movie was, eh. My biggest complaint was that Edward Cullen is supposed to look like he is carved out of marble, not pelts of dog hair. Ever heard of wax?

    Now, I need a new vice.

    • Judith Shakespeare

      Ditto on the vice part. (And the dog hair. Ewwww.)

  • http://napwarden.blogspot.com Nap Warden

    Hi, it’s me…the last person on the planet who hasn’t read these books:P I did however get dragged to see the movie. Surprise, surprise…I thought it was a stinkeroonie! Hmmmm….who would have thunk that dating a vampire could end badly?

    • Judith Shakespeare

      Read the books, love. Seriously. There’s no way to even slightly appreciate the movie otherwise.

  • http://somewhatvoluble.wordpress.com Megan

    The books, I loved. The movie, I only liked. I agree–the characters were underdeveloped. To get a good understanding of the movie, you have to read the book. Jasper looked constipated, and it really didn’t go into much detail as to why. I’m disappointed that it didn’t explain Carlisle’s past and why he wanted to create a family of vegetarians. I’m also disappointed that the movie jumped right into the meadow scene–that was a big scene in the book!

    I gave the movie a B, overall. For it’s low budget, it wasn’t bad. I’m just glad they’re making enough money to make New Moon better.

    • Judith Shakespeare

      It didn’t explain anything! The entire focus of the movie was Edward’s face. Nothing on any of the other characters. Nothing. If I had to rate it…. Dirty Dancing was a B. LOL. I’d give it a C or a C-. One would imagine that even on a low-budget, it wouldn’t have been too hard to at least try to follow the story as set by the book on which the movie was based. (And hi!!!!)

  • http://thegunchick.wordpress.com Roxy

    Note to self: go pick up the series and read them. I tried with book one and just never got into it, but that was during a rather hectic time anyway…

    Second note to self: skip the movie.

    Meanwhile, you just described my opinion on most book-to-film adaptations, though I am usually very forgiving, realizing that film is limited and imagination is not. Most of them strike me as a sandwich without any filling.

  • http://suchlovelyfreckles.typepad.com/ suchlovelyfreckles

    We considered watching Twilight, but then Daniel Craig’s eyes drew me into James Bond. It was a rather disappointing performance, and I should have seen Twilight instead… I think. Those eyes…

  • http://www.mainesherpababies.com Shanta

    I just finished the first book and was not “sucked” in. I guess I read too much Annie Rice when I was a teen – now that’s a vampire series to fall for. I will probably read the rest – but I might wait til they are at the library rather then buying the books! But, I just started the new Stephen King – Dumas Key – and CAN”T put it down.



1.©2008 by Courtney Hebert as Judith Shakespeare.
2.Subscribe to the feed, the comments or just the reviews.
3.Blog title courtesy of Oscar Wilde, pseudonym Virginia Woolf, design JudithShakes.